June 20, 2001
Technology Report "The Poles Wearable Expedition"
1. Objectives
Mission:
Unassisted skiing expedition from the coast of Antarctica to the South Pole, using wearable computing and testing
new software to transmit images.
Duration: 62 days
Members: 2
Objectives:
1. Operate and carry wearable computing in severe conditions
2. Send images from the central Polar area, using non-stationary equipment
Results:
1. The wearable units held up (for defects-see below) over entire expedition.
2. The expedition was able to transmit pictures using only mobile equipment.
More expedition related info at www.thepoles.com
2. Overview
The expedition members wore the computers on their bodies from the start of the expedition to the end.
During nighttime the technology was stored close to the body, inside sleeping bags.
A solar panel was attached to the sleds, with batteries charged mainly
while in camp (midnight sun).
The Orbcomm units, carried in backpacks, performed well in very low temperatures.
The wearable computing was carried in tailor made west's underneath a gore-tex wind jacket.
The head-mounted display was tucked into a pocket in the west while skiing.
Computer work was mainly done inside the tent. Daily skiing average time was 10 hours,
requiring full discipline in order to maintain daily required distances. The
skiers paused for 7 min. every 1 hour 20 min to replenish. There was no time
available for computer work during the pauses.
Dispatches were sent daily, requiring the use of computers app. 1,5 hour every day.
Outside temperature ranged from -5 to -30 C. In full sun and the stove going, it could get pretty warm inside the tent.
Water bottles placed on the tent floor froze however.
Antarctica is the worlds driest continent, yet the wearables were constantly exposed to water due to heavy perspiration while skiing. On several occasions all equipment
froze.
The equipment took severe beating during the expedition, but no single unit (besides a holding screw on the HMD), actually broke from wear and tear.
A half wave antenna was run over by a snowmobile, upon starting the expedition from Patriot Hill. Fixed with a stick and
ducked-tape, it too worked fine for the duration of the expedition.
3. Technology problems encountered by the expedition:
When
|
Unit
|
Problem
|
Solution
|
Day
2
|
Keyboard
|
One key press resulted in three characters
|
None
|
Day
18
|
Via
no2 (BIW)
|
USB-port
uninstalled
|
Unfixable
at location (w/out keyboard).
|
Day
21
|
HMD
|
Head
fixture broke
|
Wired inside ski mask, OK
|
Day
24
|
Via
no1 (ExWeb)
|
Start
up difficulties
|
Needed
3-5 attempts
|
Day
25
|
Molicel
battery
|
Dead
|
None
(3 back-ups)
|
Day
35
|
Molicel
battery
|
Dead
|
None
(2 back-ups)
|
Day
42
|
Abatel
battery
|
Fire
(human factor)
|
None
(1 back-up)
|
Day
1-62
|
Orbcomm
|
Receiving
messages in sat storage mode
|
None
|
4. Working with wearables - the human interface
Expedition member 1
"Starting out from Patriot Hill I
was pulling a sled of 335 lb. The sled was hooked in the mid belt of a
climbers backpack. The tech west was carried above a wool long sleeved t-shirt
and covered by a 2-layer Gore Tex wind jacket. The west was
adjustable and I shortened it so the computer in the back-pocket fitted
at my waist. 90 % of the pulling power was on my hips. The west fitted nicely
and I had no problems wearing it. Pulling the weight, averaging 9
hours daily, inflicted some damage to my hips, and the first couple of
weeks I had open bruises."
"The last 10 % of the pulling power
came on my shoulders, and the shoulder straps from the west sometimes
interfered with the pack straps causing severe pain. I dismantled the
holding pocket for the web cam and also made some adjustments to the
straps, but I would probably work on a more convenient solution for the
future."
"Starting day 40, I became
ill with chest
pains, and even though the sled was considerable lighter now (app.
150-200 lb.), I got more sensitive to the load. Some of those days
I therefore removed the wearables, and stored them on the sled."
"Working the wearables while skiing
was virtually impossible. The high level of concentration gave place for
nothing else than skiing and thinking. A couple of times we tried to
talk to each other while skiing - that too proved impossible. With a
pulse ranging over 120 for 9 hours daily, working with tech would have
required us to stop. Bad hypothermia would kick in if we stopped more than
5-7 min. Another problem was the lack of functional input device while
skiing. Voice would have been an option, but this version of the VIA
computer couldn't support the software."
"Inside the tent, it was a
completely
different story. We had no problems cropping and resizing images and
writing text. Actually we had the same tools as at our office"
"For advanced field work, I never believe a PDA will do the job.
You need a fast computer running a full OS. You also need a big display
to work on. I still favor the HMD, even though it was a hassle to get it
up and running with port replicator and cords. The display is
great but the mounting outfit need improvement".
Expedition member 2
"I carried a computer,
battery, HMD and finger mouse. The hardest to store in the west were the
finger mouse and HMD. The west with the computing setup was easy to
carry, and I hardly felt it while skiing. As the expedition proceeded
however, I lost much weight and the west thus became harder to carry. It
frictioned my hip bones and felt heavy. It was the first thing I removed
when in tent."
"I preferred to work with the
flat panel display in the beginning, due to that I was accustomed to
it from office work. As the expedition went on and equipment failed, I
was forced to use the finger mouse and HMD for dispatches and pics. I
found editing dispatches a tedious work using the finger mouse, but
working the pics easy. Over time I grew accustomed to the HMD display
and worked rather easily with it. Because it is so much more convenient
to carry the HMD on the body, compared to the rather bulky flat panel
display, I would prefer it onwards. However, I never really trusted the
HMD quite as much as I learned to trust the flat panel display. The HMD
froze at times but would continue operating upon thawing, starting with
a lined and discolored display, but clearing in around 20 minutes."
"I found the equipment
durable and trustworthy, except for the HMD and the hand operated
keymouses. I would prefer a smaller computer unit and especially a
better power solution. A sturdier HMD version and a working small
keyboard or voice input.
The work with the computing
and transmissions took a considerable toll on our time and strength. It
took great self discipline to continue the work daily, in a state of
exhaustion and deterioration. It was on the other hand also a thrilling
and rewarding contribution to a quite monotonous journey."
5. Equipment list
Computer
|
Units
|
|
VIA 2
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Display
|
|
|
Daylight flat panel display
|
1
|
|
Head mounted display
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Input
|
|
|
Finger mouse
|
2
|
|
Wrist keyboard
|
1
|
|
Twiddler keyboard
|
|
|
|
|
|
Picture input
|
|
|
Canon Digital Elph
|
1
|
|
3 COM web cam
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Communication
|
|
|
Orbcomm, Panasonic
|
2
|
|
VHF antenna
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
|
IDG solar panel
|
2
|
|
Abatel buffert battery
|
2
|
|
Molicel
|
4
|
|
Energy Access DCcharger
|
1
|
|
DC/AC converter
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Wests
|
|
|
BIW
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Emergency
|
|
|
Argos transmitter
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Navigation
|
|
|
Garmin Etrex GPS
|
1
|
|
Silva GPS
|
1
|
|
Questions: tt@humanedgetech.com
|